|
July 2003
(Issue No. 1: Decisions published June 15–30)
|
|
Second CircuitCircuit Court of Appeals:
|
District Court Erred In Finding IMARKETING NEWS Generic As A Matter of Law |
|||
 |
|
Courtenay Communications Corp. v. Hall (summary judgment reversed because district court applied incorrect legal standard in finding mark generic) |
|
|
Visual Artists Rights Act Preempts Lanham Act Claims Based On Removal Of Sculpture From Building Wall |
|||
|
|
Board Of Managers Of Soho Int'l Arts Condominium v. Forrest Myers, et al. (artist has no Lanham Act claim against building owner who removed sculpture) |
|
|
Preliminary Injunction Granted To Enjoin Use Of Plaintiffs' Late Father's Name As Name Of Scholastic Prize |
|||
|
|
Bueno v. Dance Perspectives Foundation, Inc. (defendant agreed to cease using name of plaintiffs' deceased father) |
|
|
Preliminary injunction Denied In Dispute Over Bar and Dance Club Trade Dress |
|||
|
|
Do The Hustle, LLC, et al. v. Rogovich, et al. (plaintiff did not show likelihood of suceess on confusion issue) |
|
Circuit Court of Appeals:
|
Under Pennsylvania Law, Advertising Injury Clause Covered Insured For Trademark Infringement Claim |
|||
|
|
CAT Internet Services, Inc., et al. v. Providence Washington Insurance Co., et al. (ordering publication of prior opinion at 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 28127) |
|
Circuit Court of Appeals:
|
Evidence Did Not Support Nationwide Scope Of Injunction |
|||
|
|
Emergency One, Inc. v. American Fire Eagle Engine Company, Inc. (nationwide injunction vacated because no evidence regarding areas where senior user used its mark) |
|
Circuit Court of Appeals:
|
Fair Use Protected Use Of "Tiger Woods" In Connection With Art Print Depicting His Victory At The 1997 Masters Tournament |
|||
|
|
ETW Corp. v. Jireh Publishing, Inc. (First Amendment concerns outweigh any possible confusion as to source or endorsement) |
|
|
Court Rejects Dilution By Tarnishment Claim Based On Link To Pornographic Site Appearing On Same Web Site Where Plaintiff's Mark Appears |
|||
|
|
Voice-Tel Enterprises, Inc., v. Joba, Inc. (presence of links to third-party pornographic web sites, appearing in web site bearing Plaintiff's mark, does not cause dilution by tarnishment) |
|
